“Rifaximin Treatment in Hepatic Encephalopathy”
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar25;362(12):1071-81. [free full text]
As we are well aware at Georgetown, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is highly prevalent among patients with cirrhosis, and admissions for recurrent HE place a significant burden on the medical system. The authors of this study note that HE is thought to result from “the systemic accumulation of gut-derived neurotoxins, especially ammonia, in patients with impaired liver function and portosystemic shunting.” Lactulose is considered the standard of care for the prevention of HE. It is thought to decrease the absorption of ammonia in the gut lumen through its cathartic effects and by alteration of colonic pH. The minimally absorbable oral antibiotic rifaximin is thought to further reduce ammonia production through direct antibacterial effects within the gut lumen. Thus the authors of this pivotal 2010 study sought to determine the additive effect of daily rifaximin prophylaxis in the prevention of HE.
Population: adults with cirrhosis and 2+ episodes of overt HE during the past 6 months
Notable exclusion criteria: West Haven Criteria score of 2+ at enrollment, MELD score > 25, baseline Cr > 2.0, or if prior qualifying HE episodes were 2/2 GIB, medication effect, or renal failure
Intervention: rifaximin 550mg PO BID x6 months
Comparison: placebo 550mg PO BID x6 months
Primary: time to first breakthrough episode of HE (West Haven Score of 2+ or West Haven Score 0 –> 1 with worsening asterixis)
- time to first hospitalization involving HE
- adverse events, including those “possibly related to infection”
299 patients were randomized. 140 and 159 patients were assigned to rifaximin and placebo, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. Lactulose use prior to and during the study was similar in both groups at approximately 91%.
Breakthrough HE occurred in 31 (22.1%) of the rifaximin patients and 73 (45.9%) of the placebo patients [HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.64, p<0.001, absolute risk reduction 23.7%, NNT = 4.2]. This result was consistent within all tested subgroups, except patients with MELD score 19-24 and patients who were not using lactulose at baseline (see Figure 3).
Hospitalization involving HE occurred in 19 (13.6%) of the rifaximin patients and 36 (22.6%) of the placebo patients [HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87, p = 0.01, absolute risk reduction 9.1%, NNT = 11.0].
There were no differences in adverse events among the two treatment groups.
Prophylactic rifaximin reduced the incidence of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy and its resultant hospitalizations.
This landmark trial showed a clear treatment benefit with implied savings in healthcare utilization costs associated with HE recurrences and hospitalizations. This marked effect was demonstrated even in the setting of relatively good (91%) lactulose adherence in both treatment arms prior to and throughout the trial.
On the day this trial was published in 2010, the FDA approved rifaximin for “reduction in risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy recurrence” in adults.
Because rifaximin is not generic and remains quite expensive, its financial utility is limited from an insurance company’s perspective. There is no other comparable nonabsorbable antibiotic for this indication.
UpToDate suggests starting with lactulose therapy and then adding a nonabsorbable antibiotic, such as rifaximin, both for the treatment of overt hepatic encephalopathy and for the prevention of recurrent hepatic encephalopathy. In practice, most insurance companies will require a prior authorization for outpatient rifaximin treatment, but in my recent experience this process has been perfunctory and easy.
Summary by Duncan F. Moore, MD